Criminal justice reform consultant
Tuesday, 04 August 2026 / Published in Law, Problem Solving Courts
Treatment Courts Evidence
Do specialty courts improve public safety and reduce recidivism? This evidence-based review examines current research on treatment courts, addresses common criticisms, and explains what today's evidence and national best practice standards actually show.
David Wallace Traffic Safety Expert
Tuesday, 28 July 2026 / Published in Law, Problem Solving Courts, Substance Use Disorder
Language in Treatment Courts
Words influence more than conversation—they shape perception, reduce or reinforce stigma, and affect how justice is experienced. Discover why language is an essential component of treatment courts, procedural justice, and evidence-based practices that support long-term recovery.
substance use disorders in the justice system
Substance use disorders affect every part of the justice system. This new series explores five evidence-based principles that can strengthen public safety, improve outcomes, and support long-term recovery.
Avatar photo
Tuesday, 14 July 2026 / Published in Artificial Intelligence, Law
Judicial Education and Justice Reform Consulting
Artificial intelligence, behavioral health research, and emerging technologies are transforming the justice system at an unprecedented pace. Yet innovation alone cannot ensure fairness, accountability, or public trust. The future of justice will depend on informed leadership, evidence-based decision-making, and collaboration across disciplines.
Avatar photo
Thursday, 18 June 2026 / Published in Community Supervision, Podcast
future of community supervision
In this episode of Justice Speaks, Gene Cotter, Nebraska’s State Probation Administrator, discusses evidence-based probation, workload-based supervision models, treatment courts, technology, behavioral health challenges, workforce recruitment, and the emerging role of artificial intelligence in community corrections.
Criminal justice reform consultant
Tuesday, 16 June 2026 / Published in Artificial Intelligence, Law
Professional Accountability in AI
A federal judge removed four attorneys from a case after both sides submitted AI-generated citations to cases that did not exist. The lesson extends far beyond legal research. As courts and justice agencies adopt artificial intelligence, professional accountability remains the most important safeguard. AI can assist the work, but responsibility for the outcome must always remain with people.
Avatar photo
Thursday, 04 June 2026 / Published in Community Supervision, Podcast
Dr. Carmen Gomez joins Justice Speaks to discuss probation leadership, diversion programming, pretrial services, and the growing role of artificial intelligence in community supervision. The conversation explores how compassion, accountability, and individualized support can improve outcomes within the criminal legal system.
Criminal justice reform consultant
Tuesday, 02 June 2026 / Published in Artificial Intelligence, Law
AI Tort Liability
Artificial intelligence regulation may develop through tort litigation faster than through legislation. Courts are increasingly applying traditional product liability principles to AI systems, chatbots, and digital platforms. This article examines how judges, juries, and evolving tort doctrines may shape the future boundaries of AI accountability and governance.
Avatar photo
Thursday, 28 May 2026 / Published in Podcast, Problem Solving Courts
Problem-Solving Courts
Chief Justice Loretta Rush joins Justice Speaks to discuss problem-solving courts, juvenile justice reform, family recovery courts, and evidence-based approaches to substance use disorders and behavioral health challenges within the justice system.
Criminal justice reform consultant
Tuesday, 26 May 2026 / Published in Artificial Intelligence, Law
AI Governance in the Justice System
Artificial intelligence is already embedded within the justice system. Courts do not need to wait for legislatures or technology companies to establish governance standards. Through disclosure requirements, procurement oversight, auditing, and procedural safeguards, courts already possess substantial authority to regulate how AI systems operate within judicial institutions.
TOP

Get more information like this
in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list
and get interesting content and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Oops. Something went wrong.