Effective alcohol testing for impaired drivers is a cornerstone of evidence-based supervision. This blog explores why testing matters, how to identify client needs, and how to implement best practices using technologies like IIDs and PAMs. When done right, testing is about support, accountability, and long-term change.
Justice is more than a government title—it’s a personal mission. This blog explores how every person can serve as a “Minister of Justice” by promoting fairness, respect, and integrity in their daily interactions. Discover the transformative power of empathy and equity in building a more just society for all.
This blog explores the surprising history of video jury trials, beginning with a 1971 Ohio case and extending to modern Zoom proceedings. It examines juror reactions, the civil vs. criminal debate, and how courts are adapting to pandemic-era challenges—proving that what’s old may be new again in the justice system.
The Daubert standard reshaped judicial roles as gatekeepers of scientific evidence, yet its application remains inconsistent. While civil courts apply rigorous scrutiny, criminal courts often admit unreliable forensic evidence. Judges must correct this imbalance to ensure justice. The Science Bench Book for Judges offers guidance to navigate this critical issue.
Slate’s Ramos v. Louisiana analysis underscores the judiciary’s struggle with racial history. Persistent trust gaps—especially among African Americans—stem from perceived procedural fairness deficits. True public engagement—ongoing, two-way dialogue—can bridge this divide, as shown by programs at the Red Hook Community Justice Center and Cleveland Municipal Court’s community-driven initiatives.
COVID-19 accelerated the adoption of telejurisprudence in courts worldwide. This blog explores how virtual hearings, remote procedures, and new courtroom standards are reshaping justice, while also acknowledging the limitations of this shift. From Zoom arraignments to hybrid jury trials, the future of courtrooms may never be the same.
Chief District Court Judge Tom Jarrell (Guilford County, NC) died suddenly last August in his bedroom. His colleagues were stunned at his sudden passing at age 56. They went from stunned to shocked when his autopsy results were revealed last week showing his cause of death as an accidental overdose of fentanyl and heroin. One
-
Accountability: Recovery and Public Safety Can Coexist
Accountability does not have to mean punishment... -
Substance Use Disorders Are Treatable: Recovery Is Possible
Substance use disorders are treatable, and reco... -
Understanding Substance Use Disorders in the Justice System
Science has changed what we know about substanc...
