Is your Treatment Court at Risk? By Hon. Geno Salomone (Ret.) and Hon. Brian MacKenzie (Ret.) As of this article’s writing, there are still a large number of judges who persist in withholding medications from individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD), arguing that it merely replaces one addictive substance with another.[1] Similarly, certain probation or corrections
The evidence supporting the importance of procedural fairness (PF) in maintaining judicial legitimacy and improving defendant outcomes is significant. PF refers to the idea that courts and other criminal justice institution can create a process that is universally perceived as fair and impartial using four key components: voice, respectful treatment, neutrality, and trust. Substantial evidence establishes
This past October, the Justice Speakers Institute’s (JSI) three partners — David Wallace, Mack Jenkins, and Brian MacKenzie —conducted a series of court training programs, presentations, and interviews in Australia, beginning in the city of Hobart and then later in the city of Melbourne. Training in Hobart, Tasmania Hobart is the capital and largest city
-
Accountability: Recovery and Public Safety Can Coexist
Accountability does not have to mean punishment... -
Substance Use Disorders Are Treatable: Recovery Is Possible
Substance use disorders are treatable, and reco... -
Understanding Substance Use Disorders in the Justice System
Science has changed what we know about substanc...
