
Harm reduction is an essential component of any modern MOUD strategy, but without clear boundaries, it can become misunderstood, misapplied, or perceived as permissive rather than protective. Courts must balance compassion with structure, ensuring that harm reduction practices support engagement, reduce mortality, and promote stability—while still maintaining accountability and public safety. Presented by Chief Cynthia Herriott (Ret.), this session provides judges with a practical framework for implementing harm reduction approaches that are clinically sound, ethically grounded, and operationally disciplined.
Objectives:
1. Identify the core principles of harm reduction and understand where judicial guardrails are necessary to maintain safety, accountability, and treatment integrity.
2. Apply structured court practices, such as clear expectations, communication protocols with providers, and measured responses to relapse, that support harm reduction without weakening supervision.
3. Build a balanced model that uses harm reduction to stabilize participants while maintaining consistent judicial oversight and evidence-based boundaries.