Forensic impression evidence has become the subject of increased levels of scientific scrutiny. In particular, bite-mark evidence has been seriously questioned due to its weak underpinnings and the exaggerated testimony
A mere month ago I asserted there would never be a jury trial by teleconference in a blog post for Justice Speakers Institute, LLC. Not only was I proved wrong last
The Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert vs. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (Daubert) was an attempt to stem the growth of unreliable scientific evidence that flowed the evidentiary standard fashioned in Frye
On April 22, Slate reporter Leah Litman ended her story about the starkly contrasting SCOTUS majority and minority opinions in Ramos v. Louisiana with a judgement: “There is no easy
There is no dearth of information about the impact of the COVID-19 virus and subsequent quarantine and their effects on the courts. In a recent survey from the National Judicial
Chief District Court Judge Tom Jarrell (Guilford County, NC) died suddenly last August in his bedroom. His colleagues were stunned at his sudden passing at age 56. They went from
20/20 vision is considered by some to be perfect eyesight, but what it really means is that a person does not need any aids, such as glasses, to see even
In 2016, the United States Surgeon General issued the report: Facing Addiction in America: The Surgeon General’s Report on Alcohol, Drugs, and Health. In the report, he defined “addiction” as:
Every family has one — Grandpa who is an “alkie,” the “junkie” cousin, the little brother who has become a “pothead,” and Mom who takes too many Vicodin. But what we
At the 92nd PAAM Annual Conference, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney and JSI Vice President David J. Wallace was presented with the MATCP Jeff Sauter Treatment Court Award.