Judicial Education and Justice Reform Consulting

A Decade of Impact: Justice Speakers Institute Celebrates 10 Years of Advancing Justice Worldwide

Justice Speakers Institute celebrates a decade of advancing justice reform worldwide. Founded in 2015 by Judge Peggy Hora, David Wallace, and Judge Brian MacKenzie, JSI has become a global leader in judicial education, evidence-based practice, and innovative court reform, shaping the next decade of progress in justice.
  • Published in Law
Tagged under: , , , ,
policing perspective on justice reform

The Ones We Fear and the Ones We’re Mad At: A Policing Perspective on Justice Reform

Former Police Chief Cynthia Herriott examines how emotions like fear and anger influence law enforcement responses and criminal justice policy. She distinguishes between dangerous offenders and those struggling with addiction or poverty, urging a shift toward evidence-based, compassionate approaches that enhance public safety and reduce recidivism.
Tagged under: , , , ,
AI in the courts

Part Five: Courts of the Future – Innovation, Access, and Global Trends

As artificial intelligence transforms judicial systems worldwide, courts are redefining how justice is delivered. From AI-powered transcription to online dispute resolution, innovation is improving efficiency and access—but must never eclipse fairness. This post explores global trends ensuring AI in the courts enhances justice without diminishing human judgment.
Tagged under: , , , ,
Phil Bowen on Justice Innovation

The Centre for Justice Innovation: Building a Smarter and Fairer Justice System with Phil Bowen

In this episode, Justice Speaks features Phil Bowen, Director of the Centre for Justice Innovation. Bowen discusses evidence-based reforms transforming the British justice system, from diversion and smarter sentencing to procedural fairness and the Common Ground Justice Project, all aimed at building a fairer and more effective system.
Tagged under: , , , , ,
Harm Reduction and Accountability

Harm Reduction Needs Guardrails: Balancing Compassion and Accountability

Harm reduction is an essential part of recovery but must not mean a lack of accountability. Drawing lessons from Oregon’s policy challenges, this article explains why treatment courts need structure, incentives, and consequences. True recovery requires compassion paired with meaningful accountability to prevent relapse and promote long-term change.
Tagged under: , , , ,

Part Four: AI in the Courts:  Judicial Decision-Making: Transparency, Accountability, and the Judicial Role

As AI tools enter the courtroom, judges face new challenges of transparency, accountability, and maintaining their central decision-making role. This installment examines how AI is reshaping judicial reasoning, the risks of overreliance, and why human judgment remains essential to preserving fairness, ethics, and public trust in justice.
Tagged under: , , , ,
AI-generated evidence admissibility

Part Three: AI on Trial – Admissibility of AI-Generated Evidence

Artificial intelligence is producing new forms of evidence—from deepfakes to algorithmic analyses—that challenge traditional evidentiary rules. This installment explores how courts can ensure AI-generated material meets the tests of relevance, reliability, and authenticity under Frye, Daubert, and Rule 702, safeguarding fairness and due process in the age of AI.
Tagged under: , , , ,
Strong Unitary Executive Theory

Preserving Balance: State Responses to the Strong Unitary Executive Theory

The Strong Unitary Executive Theory (SUET) threatens to expand presidential power at the expense of checks and balances. This blog explores how states can respond through litigation, constitutional protections, and collaborative strategies to preserve democratic integrity and federalism in the face of growing judicial deference to executive authority.
  • Published in Law
Tagged under: , , , ,
AI in the Courts Ethics

Part Two: AI in the Courts: Ethical Challenges

AI is reshaping the justice system, but with it come profound ethical challenges. From bias in risk assessments to the “black box” problem of transparency, judges and lawyers must balance innovation with fairness. Ethical vigilance is vital to protect public trust, due process, and the legitimacy of judicial decision-making.
Tagged under: , , , ,
AI in the courtroom

Part One: AI in the Courtroom: Opportunities and Risks

Artificial intelligence is transforming the courtroom, reshaping legal research, case management, and access to justice. While AI offers efficiency and consistency, it also raises concerns about bias, transparency, and fairness. Courts now face the challenge of balancing innovation with accountability to preserve the integrity of justice.
Tagged under: , , , ,