Legal training tends to emphasize a set of criteria for evaluating fairness in the courts that differs in some notable respects from those the public uses when deciding what is fair and what promotes trust. That gap creates the potential for misunderstanding when judges set out to define what the public expects and the quality
Have you ever heard of the “Daubert/Frye” test? The apparent merging of the Frye and Daubert standards reflects a certain confusion that exists on the appropriate legal standard for the admissibility of scientific evidence, particularly in criminal cases. While the standard for the admission of scientific evidence can vary widely from federal courts to state courts and from state to
-
Transforming Probation Officer Leadership: Chief Daniel Hernandez’s Vision
This episode of Justice Speaks highlights the l... -
Leadership and Legacy: Judge Anchondo on DWI Treatment Court Innovation in Texas
Judge Robert Anchondo, Texas’ first DWI treatme... -
Desiree Hermocillo on Leading Colorado’s Problem-Solving Courts
This Justice Speaks episode highlights Desiree ...
