Part Two of Veterans Treatment Courts A Veterans Treatment Court (VTC) employs the research-supported concepts and practices of the Drug Treatment Court model, in particular a version of the Ten Key Components, to serve a justice-involved population that has previously served in the United States military. The Role of VTC Mentors One important feature that
Part One of Two It’s May, a time to enjoy spring with the flowers blooming, the grass growing and evidence of new life everywhere. But it is also a time to recognize the individuals who have changed their lives overcoming their substance dependency because of Drug Treatment Courts. May is National Drug Court Awareness Month.
The generally held belief that alcohol consumption is a matter of personal choice, can make it difficult to identify an individual suffering from an alcohol use disorder (AUD). While alcohol is the single most abused drug in the United States, with 14.1 million Americans suffering from AUD and another 25.8 million abusing alcohol, not enough
Across the globe, countries everywhere have Ministries of Justice or Departments of Justice; Government departments named for an idea—Justice. New Zealand has the Ministry of Justice; as does Japan and Greenland, with the leaders of these departments typically called the Minister of Justice. Their roles depend on the country’s legal requirements, however, with that title,
Judge Peggy Fulton Hora, a giant in the justice system, passed away on Saturday, October 31, 2020. Justice Speakers Institute’s President and one of its founders, Judge Hora has been described as a pioneer in the justice system, a global leader in the drug treatment court field, and a champion for therapeutic jurisprudence. In 1985,
Forensic impression evidence has become the subject of increased levels of scientific scrutiny. In particular, bite-mark evidence has been seriously questioned due to its weak underpinnings and the exaggerated testimony about it by some witnesses. This raises a question: how did bite-mark evidence become admissible in the first place? Witchcraft and Bite Marks With one
The Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert vs. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (Daubert) was an attempt to stem the growth of unreliable scientific evidence that flowed the evidentiary standard fashioned in Frye vs. United State. The Court held that the Frye standard of “general acceptance by the scientific community” could be considered in evaluating expert testimony. However, that