Combating DWI: Are We Doing Enough to Prevent Impaired Driving?

May 14th, 1988 is a day that will long be remembered by many.  On that day, the deadliest impaired driving crash in U.S. history occurred on Interstate 71 in Carrollton, Kentucky.  An impaired driver in a pickup truck going the wrong way on the interstate hit a church activity bus with 67 passengers.  There were 27 fatalities, 24 of them children and young adults ranging in age from 10 to 19, and 34 serious injuries.  The driver in the pickup had a .24 BAC. He was found guilt of 27 counts of manslaughter in the second degree and sentenced to 16 years in prison. But no amount of jail time, no amount of fines paid, will bring back the dead or completely heal the injured.

Since that time, over 300,000 more people have been killed and millions more injured because of impaired drivers.  However, also since that time, society has declared something needs to change it was time for combating DWI.  It has been a slow process, but over the years we have borne witness to the implementation of prevention efforts within the criminal justice system, including the strengthening of impaired driving laws, stepped-up law enforcement enforcement efforts, and the development of Traffic Safety Resource Prosecutors and other specialized criminal justice experts; ultimately strengthening the arrest, prosecution, and adjudication of DWIs, and saving thousands of lives. But we are not done. Almost 10,000 people died in 2011 due to impaired driving.  Clearly, more has to happen.

NTSBs Recommendations to End Impaired Driving

25 years later to the day, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) made recommendations that challenge us to no longer be complacent about the achievements made during the past quarter of a century.  Whether we agree or not, NTSB’s recommendations challenge us to be bold in our thinking and in our actions.  Noting there is “no simple, single solution to reaching zero traffic deaths from alcohol-involved crashes,” the National Transportation Safety Board issued new findings and recommendations calling for a comprehensive approach to end impaired driving.

Specifically, the NTSB report “makes recommendations to the states in the following safety issue areas:

• Reducing the per se blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit for all drivers,
• Conducting high-visibility enforcement of impaired driving laws and incorporating passive alcohol sensing technology into enforcement efforts,
• Expanding the use of in-vehicle devices to prevent operation by an impaired driver,
• Using driving while intoxicated (DWI) courts and other programs to reduce recidivism by repeat DWI offenders, and
• Establishing measurable goals for reducing impaired driving and tracking progress toward those goals.”  

Not surprisingly, the one recommendation that has created a furor is reducing the BAC limit for drivers from .08 to .05.  While there is some support, a number of traffic safety organizations and others have either remained silent on this particular recommendation, or come out in opposition.

It Takes Time and Continuous Effort

For years, state after state has tried to implement a quick and easy solution to ending impaired driving, such as increasing the fines and amount of incarceration.  However, after 25 years of effort, and even significant improvement, DWI is still one of the most committed crimes in the country, with 1.4 million people arrested, and 10,000 people killed every year.  Overall, our society has changed.  It is no longer acceptable to “have one more for the road,” and the “designated driver” is a well-accepted role.  But the problem of impaired driving and the unacceptable number of alcohol-related fatalities continues.  There is no quick and simple solution, combating DWI continues.  The reasons why a person drives impaired are vast: from a social evening out with friends, to an addicted person that is unable to control his use of alcohol. With so many varied causes, any effective effort to end impaired driving must be comprehensive.  NTSB is now challenging us to take up the call and look at all aspects of impaired driving.

Additional Recommendations for Action to Combating DWI

Are these recommendations enough?  No.  More can be done, including:

• Increased server training through such programs as Techniques of Alcohol Management (TAM) and Training for Intervention ProcedureS (TIPS)
• Better screening and medical interventions in the ER
• Increased screening and assessment of all DWI offenders in the courts, and
• Even greater public education and prevention efforts.

Dr. Rosekind, former NTSB Board member, once noted: “Complacency is too common, and we have to make it unacceptable. Unacceptable that any life is lost in a crash due to an impaired driver.” Whether or not we agree with all of them, these recommendations take up that challenge—to make it unacceptable that anyone dies in a crash from an impaired driver.  The recommendations encourage us to once again look at what will make a difference and start a new discussion that will reinvigorate us.   The recommendations remind us to examine what more can we do to save more lives on our highways and continue combating DWI.